Normally I am not surprised by things that get people’s hackles in an uproar when it comes to politics. This nation has become so polarized between Left-Right partisanship that things have taken on a master level of a playground battle of “I know you are but what am I?”
So when (mostly) the Right started going into convolutions over President Obama’s speech on Tuesday directed towards K-12 school children, at first I could not figure out what the big deal was. Then I started reading more about it and the more I read the more uncomfortable I became. Did I believe this was our equivalent of Stalin trying to brainwash our youth in believing that the only path to happiness was through the State? Of course not. But on a philosophical level, it just did not seem right the way it was set up.
Let me first go on record in saying that I am all for the President of the United States speaking to children especially on the importance of education. But this was turning into being much more. This speech actually came with a set curriculum designed by the Department of Education that teachers were supposed to use in conjunction with the speech.
From the reports that were leaked, not only was this a “welcome back to school” talk, but also a plea for school children to take on their part in civic responsibility for such things as global warming. Maybe that alone might not have been that bad, but one of the curriculum assignments for the elementary grades was to write a letter to themselves on ways that they could help the President make this a better country. And K-3 teachers are supposed to engage their students in talks about why it is important that we always listen to President.
Frankly I believe that the topic of civic responsibility would make for a great classroom discussion for the upper grades and debate the merits of the options the President talks about. But children from yournger grades are not cognitively able to use critical thinking skills. These young children are taught to simply follow whatever authority figures say – and no authority would be higher than the President – so they would have to take everything he says as the way it should be.
This is what I have concerns with.
Of course as soon as these things were leaked out, the curriculum was quickly changed to try and calm people down. At this point, I have no doubt that what the President will be saying on Tuesday will be incredibly watered down and to focus solely on the importance of education and staying in school. Then of course when it turns out to be non-controversial, the Left will be able to crow about how the Right was just blowing things out of proportion not taking into account the original plan. But we will see.
So from where I am sitting, the controversy was not that the President was speaking to school children but rather that it came with a set curriculum designed around the vision and philosophy of the President. Whether that vision is good or bad does not matter because it sets what could be a scary precident. I wonder if the people who are in favor of President Obama's speech would feel the same way if President Bush wanted to speak directly to students on his vision what makes a good citizen. (I think we all know the answer to that one)
The sad part is that I have no doubt that a lot of what will be said on Tuesday will hold a lot of merit and cover things that we could all get behind. But the very fact that there is a polarized controversy goes to show why this speach is probably a bad idea because now the actual message is going to get lost. This uproar show why the Framers did not want a Federally run education for this country. What is taught in our classrooms is and should be a local concern decided by each state and the by the individual community through their school boards.
Because this has caused so much controversy is why we need to shield our children from the ugliness of politics as long as we can – I just wish we were all that lucky.
[Photo taken from http://www.whitehouse.gov/ where you will also find more specifics on this speech]





7 comments:
Hey Paul, great post. I would say that this is a topic that we both agree on. You could imagine what my opinion would be to a Bush education system! Keep it local...
I despised President Bush and everything he did and stood for. But if he had decided to address the students, as his father did in 1991, I would have grinned and put up with it. Had I children, I would not have kept them home from school that day. I would not have pressured the school to refuse to show the speech from the lawfully elected President of the United States of America.
The reaction of the Right, and the right-wing extremists in the media, is shameful. Did the left behave this way when Bush Sr addressed schoolchildren in 1991?
Yes, I know the left opposed the speech, but that was AFTER they heard the speech (which, especially after reading it now, after watching President Obama), was a pretty pathetic speech. And the issue the Democrats raised was not "indictrination" and "socialism," but money: the government spent all that money putting on the speech, but was cutting budgets for school lunches because it couldn't afford to feed students? That was a pretty poorly-timed move.
In regards to the "lesson plan" (suggested activities), do you know where the White House got the idea to ask students to write a letter to the President? From a Republican President, talking to students in a televised speech shown in our public schools' classrooms:
"Write me a letter -- and I'm serious about this one -- write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals. I think you know the address."
http://bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/public_papers.php?id=3450&year=1991&month=10
Bush Sr. asked students to write a letter to him -- where's the outrage for that "indoctrination"?
Ms. Forshay,
First off, thanks for taking the time to comment on my post.
And even though I feel the same about President Obama that you did about President Bush, I totally agree that it is a great thing when a President speaks to school children about the importance of staying in school and getting an education. I still have not had a chance to watch today's speech but I did read the transcripts and I think it was AWESOME!! I truly hope that every student sees this either through their school or with their parents at home.
But as I said in my post, the controversy was not in speaking to students, the problem was a set curriculum that teachers were supposed to use to go along with the speech. Yes Bush Sr. did mention writing letters but it was not a part of a set Presidential curriculum as was the intent this go round.
Also, please do not kid yourself that today's speech was the original version of the speech. From all indication from what was leaked as well as the first version of the curriculum it showed that there was a originally a big part of the speech about policy issues such as global warming.
But again let me emphasize that what was given today was great and it is something that I wish every president would do. It is just important that a federal curriculum does not come along with it. What is taught in the classrooms is a local issue, not federal
The curriculum was a suggestion, not a mandate. Teachers could take it or leave it, the White House was providing a lesson plan to help teachers out instead of asking teachers to do it themselves, adding more to already-overflowing plates.
Writing a letter is pretty standard fare when it comes to lesson plans and activities. Writing a letter to a political figure is a great way to encourage political activism in students and teach them how to be participants in our democracy (as opposed to holding tea-bagging parties or disrupting town hall meetings).
Having the suggestion to write a letter as potential after-speech activity seems to me much less "harmful" than directly mandating to students, in the speech itself, that they write the letter. But, we obviously have a difference of opinion here.
Also, had the speech included talk of global warming and what we must do to protect the environment (what's left of it) and ensure that these children and their children have a world in which to live, with trees and parks and clean water, I could not have been happier. As a teacher I never miss the chance to "indoctrinate" students on how to be more eco-conscious and eco-friendly; I ask them to recycle, to use less paper, etc. What exactly are your objections to the President asking students to take care of the planet?
As a teacher in Texas, I wish education were not left to the individual states. We have the highest teen pregnancy rate in the country, yet our textbooks are not allowed to mention contraception. We teach "creationism" in our "science" classes. And this year, we're going to offer Bible study classes. This is an example of a small group of radicals damaging the education of the entire state. I wish a higher authority could knock some sense into our State Board of Education, which currently consists of people appointed by a governor that 64% of the state voted AGAINST.
As you can see, you and I disagree on both the minor and major aspects of your post, and I know I'm not budging on my positions.
Thank you for allowing me to comment and express my opinion.
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,1
The Al-Fakher Flavored Sheesha Brand is considered by the avid hookah Users to be the most flavorful shisha available on the market. The quality of the product surpasses any other brand, as Al-Fakher shisha provides for a smoother, more enjoyable experience
http://www.maharajahookah.com/al-fakher-shisha/cat_14.html
http://www.maharajahookah.com/al-fakher-shisha/al-fakher-flavored-shisha-two-apple-50g-/prod_209.html
Al-Fakher Shisha
Al-Fakher Flavored Shisha Two Apple
Yah. I liked the part about
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
although I don't know that I'd have bothered to say it twice.
Post a Comment